[Free]Moods & Figure – categorical propositions [Syllogisms] Logical Reasoning UGC NET Paper-1 Study Notes & MCQ Download PDF for Free
Before Understand Moods & Figure We Have to Understand first What is Categorical Syllogisms & The Structure of Syllogism
A categorical syllogism is an argument consisting of exactly three categorical propositions (two premises and a conclusion) in which there appear a total of exactly three categorical terms, each of which is used exactly twice.
As explained above, a syllogism is made up of 3 propositions, with 2 being premises and 1 as the conclusion. Of the two premises, one will be the minor premise, whereas the other will be a major premise.
In order to differentiate a minor premise from a major premise, we shall first take a look at the conclusion. It has been defined in the last section that a conclusion, being a proposition, will have a subject and a predicate. Although we have already defined a Subject and Predicate, we must also be aware that the Subject and Predicate are also known as terms
there will always be 2 terms in a Categorical Proposition (Subject and Predicate). Therefore, the conclusion of a syllogism will have a Subject and a Predicate as well. Here are two rules to take note of:
1. The Subject of a conclusion will be the Minor Term of the syllogism. 2. The Predicate of a conclusion will be the Major Term of the syllogism.
A syllogism is made up of 2 premises and 1 conclusion. So how do we differentiate between one premise from the other? Simple, take a look at that following two rules:
3. The Premise in which the Minor Term appears will be called the Minor Premise. 4. The Premise in which the Major Term appears will be called the Major Premise.
Let us the following syllogism as an example:
Socrates is a man.
All men are mortal.
Socrates is mortal.
The conclusion of this syllogism is “Socrates is mortal”.
The subject here is “Socrates”, which is also the minor term. “Socrates” appeared within the premise “Socrates is a man” making it the minor premise in this syllogism.
Socrates is a man. ← Minor premiseAll men are mortal.Socrates is mortal.
The predicate of the conclusion will be “mortal”, thus the second proposition, “All men are mortal”, will be the major premise.
Socrates is a man.All men are mortal. ← Major premiseSocrates is mortal.
The middle term will appear in both the minor and major premises, but not in the conclusion. Therefore, the middle term in this syllogism will be “man/men”.
Socrates is a man.All men are mortal.Socrates is mortal.
To summarize:
Minor Term | Middle Term | Major Term | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Minor Premise | “Socrates is a man” | Socrates | Man | – |
Major Premise | “All men are mortal” | – | Man | Mortal |
Conclusion | “Socrates is mortal” | Socrates | – | Mortal |
What is Mood & Figure ?
Mood and Figure
The mood of a categorical syllogism in standard form is a string
of three letters indicating, respectively, the forms of the major
premise, minor premise, and conclusion of the syllogism. Thus,
the mood of the syllogism in Example Given Below is EAE.
Note, however, that syllogisms can have the same mood but still
differ in logical form.
Example 1
- No birds are mammals.
- All dogs are mammals.
- Therefore, no dogs are birds.
Definition: The major premise of a categorical syllogism (in standard form) is the premise containing the major term.
Definition: The minor premise of a categorical syllogism (in standard form) is the premise containing the minor term.
Comment: It follows that, in a standard form categorical syllogism, the first
premise is the major premise and the second premise is the minor premise
Consider the following example:
Example 2
- No mammals are birds.
- All mammals are animals.
- Therefore, no animals are birds.
-
Example 3 also has the form EAE. But, unlike Example 2, it is
invalid. What’s the difference?
The syllogisms in Examples 1 and 2 have the following forms, respectively:
No P are M. No M are P.
All S are M. All M are S.
No S are P. No S are P. - These two syllogisms differ in figure.
The figure of a categorical syllogism is determined by the position
of the middle term. There are four possible figures:
First Figure - Second Figure
- Third Figure
- Fourth figure
- M-P P-M M-P P-M
- S-M S-M M-S M-S
S-P S-P S-P S-P
The syllogism in Example 1 exhibits second figure. The one in
Example 2 exhibits third figure.
Now for the central fact about syllogistic validity:
The form of a categorical syllogism is completely determined
by its mood and figure.
Aristotle worked out exhaustively which combinations of mood and
figurec result in valid forms and which result in invalid forms. Thus,
the form of Example 2 (“EAE-2”) is valid; that of Example 3 (“EAE3”) is invalid.
There are 256 combinations of mood and figure (64 (4 × 4 × 4)
moods × 4 figures). Only fifteen are valid.
The valid syllogistic forms
First figure: AAA, EAE, AII, EIO
Second figure: EAE, AEE, EIO, AOO- Third figure: IAI, AII, OAO, EIO
Fourth figure: AEE, IAI, EIO
In working out the valid forms, Aristotle made an assumption that
is rejected by most modern logicians, namely, that all terms deno
nonempty classes. On this assumption, nine more forms turn out
valid in addition to the fifteen above.
Forms valid in Aristotelian logic only
First figure: AAI, EAO
Second figure: AEO, EAO
Third figure: AAI, EAO
Fourth figure: AEO, EAO, AAI
Types of Proposition
All forms of Propositions can exist in one of 4 different types. These 4 types are denoted by the code letters A,E,I,O. These code letters are derived from the 2 Latin vowels affirmo and nego.
Code Type | Name | English | Example |
---|---|---|---|
Type A | Universal Affirmative | All S is P | All birds have wings |
Type E | Universal Negative | No S is P | No birds have gills |
Type I | Particular Affirmative | Some S is P | Some birds can fly |
Type O | Particular Negative | Some S is not P | Some birds cannot fly |
Type A – Universal Affirmative proposition
All of the subject will be distributed in the class defined by the predicate.
Example:
All birds have wingsType E proposition
Type E – Universal Negative proposition
None of the subject will be distributed in the class defined by the predicate.
Example:
No birds have gillsType I and O proposition
Type I – Particular Affirmative proposition
Some of the subject will be distributed in the class defined by the predicate.
Example:
Some birds can fly
Type O – Particular Negative proposition
Some of the subject will not be distributed in the class defined by the predicate.
Example:
Some birds cannot fly
Related Articles-
- UGC NET Paper-1 Study Notes In Hindi [In PDF] As Per Updated Syllabus 2024 [ Download PDF]UGC NET Paper -1 Study Notes Hindi : प्रिया यूजीसी नेट छात्रों यहां पर सभी इकाई वार यूजीसी नेट पेपर वन [Hindi] के अध्ययन नोट्स आपको मिल जाएंगे नीचे दी गई तालिका में किसी भी परीक्षा की तैयारी करने के …
- Venn Diagram Study Notes in Hindi with Question Answer UGC NET Paper-1 Logical Reasoning Download PDF for Free
- [Free] Venn Diagram Logical Reasoning- Study Notes UGC NET Paper-1 Download PDF For Free with Question Answer 2021
- UGC NET Paper 1 Study Notes in Hindi Download PDF in Hindi Teaching Aptitude(शिक्षण योग्यता) 2024
- UGC NET Paper-1 Free online classes in Hindi अभी हमारा ऐप डाउनलोड करके रजिस्टर्ड करेंप्रत्येक वर्ष लाखों छात्र यूजीसी नेट परीक्षा में सम्मिलित होते हैं जिनका माध्यम हिंदी होता है क्योंकि हिंदी हमारी मातृभाषा है और हमें समझने और पढ़ने में आसानी होती है किंतु देखा गया है की हिंदी माध्यम के छात्रों को …